Subject: Re: Version numbers past, present, and future.
From: Steve Freitas (sflist@ihonk.com)
Date: Tue Aug 01 2000 - 17:56:20 EDT
>Hm. Never thought of it that way. Perhaps use 1.5 as an interim release
>until we get the tree patched up -- ?
That's my vote. Let's save 2.0 for when we really mean it, when we've
moved a bunch of these compile-time switches to run-time, and we've got a
GUI to administer it.
Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:31:47 EST