Subject: Re: Version numbers past, present, and future.
From: jeff b (jeff@univrel.pr.uconn.edu)
Date: Tue Aug 01 2000 - 09:54:31 EDT
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 Tom Watson wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 20:59:50 -0400 (EDT), netatalk-admins@umich.edu
> wrote:
> <<<deletia>>>
> >
> > We're also ready to write up some killer press releases (it's one of
> > the things we like doing), when your work is ready for a more public
> > consumption, specifically ready for a renumbering to 1.5 (and I think
> > it ought to be 'netatalk 1.5', effectively severing it from the umich
> > umbilical). I'd suggest sending such releases regularly to sites like
> > linuxtoday.com, linux weekly news, macintouch/macnn/macweek.
> >
> <<<deletia>>>
> > Harry
> >
>
>
> May I recommend that we call it "Netatalk 2.0" It would indicate a
> "New Beginning". While version 1.5 might sound logical, it still
> is a 1.x version. Since there have been so many "additions" (asun's
> among others), We might as well go "whole hog".
Hm. Never thought of it that way. Perhaps use 1.5 as an interim release
until we get the tree patched up -- ?
> Regardless, the press release idea would be the best yet. Get it known
> that an AppleTalk server can exist on Linux/Unix boxen.
Absolutely agreed.
*************************
jeff b
system administrator
university communications
university of connecticut
jeff@univrel.pr.uconn.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:31:46 EST