Subject: Re: netatalk performance
From: Joe Smith ([email protected])
Date: Thu Feb 01 1996 - 10:59:34 EST
From: Andrew Norman <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 1996 01:03:54 GMT
...
It appears that netatalk's weakness (or is it AppleTalk's weakness) is
in opening and closing files then.
...
Well, right off the bat there's a big hit because you've got two Unix
files to open for every Mac file.
There is a native hfs for Linux. Last I heard it was able to mount
Apple harddisks read-only. Seems like hfs r/w capability and netatalk
would be 'perfect together', although I don't know how the
resource/data forks look to Unix processes.
<Joe
--
Joe Smith
University of Pennsylvania [email protected]
Department of Physiology
Philadelphia, PA 19104
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:23:57 EST