Re: netatalk performance

Subject: Re: netatalk performance
From: William P. McGonigle (William.P.McGonigle@Hitchcock.ORG)
Date: Thu Feb 01 1996 - 08:29:10 EST

• Next message: Rich Sudlow: "Re: netatalk performance"
• Previous message: eb04@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de: "macdump for netatalk"
• Maybe in reply to: Andrew Norman: "netatalk performance"
• Next in thread: Rich Sudlow: "Re: netatalk performance"
• Maybe reply: William P. McGonigle: "Re: netatalk performance"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Is anyone using netatalk for a busy server, on the order of 75-100 or more
concurrent users?

I'd like to see some numbers so I can compare the cost effectiveness of it vs.
AppleShare 4.x. It's free, but the RAM requirements are greater.

Thanks,
-Bill

• Next message: Rich Sudlow: "Re: netatalk performance"
• Previous message: eb04@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de: "macdump for netatalk"
• Maybe in reply to: Andrew Norman: "netatalk performance"
• Next in thread: Rich Sudlow: "Re: netatalk performance"
• Maybe reply: William P. McGonigle: "Re: netatalk performance"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:23:57 EST