RE: Why need +s chmod on files and directories?

Subject: RE: Why need +s chmod on files and directories?
From: Marc J. Miller (mjmiller@davis.com)
Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 18:01:22 EST

• Next message: Wes Yates: "Any more work being done on OPI?"
• Previous message: justine: "indexing"
• Maybe in reply to: Alex Yu: "Why need +s chmod on files and directories?"
• Next in thread: Marc J. Miller: "Re: Files over 2Gb?"
• Maybe reply: Marc J. Miller: "RE: Why need +s chmod on files and directories?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Directories, yes. Files, no.

Alex Yu wrote:

>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2000 17:13:00 -0800 (PST)
>To: netatalk-admins@umich.edu
>Subject: RE: Why need +s chmod on files and directories?
>From: "Alex Yu" <yua@nycap.rr.com>
>
>>Essentially because MacOS files don't have permissions. Directories
>>do. So the g+s option makes sure that the permissions assigned
>Hmm, on my server, I have Windows users using ftp, and Mac users using
>AppleShare. Do I have to set g+s on files that ftp creates?
>Alex

/\/\arc (sent on the move)
Lab Management: itlm019@mailbox.ucdavis.edu
Everything else: mjmiller@davis.com

• Next message: Wes Yates: "Any more work being done on OPI?"
• Previous message: justine: "indexing"
• Maybe in reply to: Alex Yu: "Why need +s chmod on files and directories?"
• Next in thread: Marc J. Miller: "Re: Files over 2Gb?"
• Maybe reply: Marc J. Miller: "RE: Why need +s chmod on files and directories?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:32:32 EST