Subject: Re: Files on Sourceforge.... (jeffb)
From: Marc J. Miller (itlm019@mailbox.ucdavis.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 20:25:24 EDT
I am assuming that SourceForge is going to be used once we have an official
1.5 release.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Zink/Netatalk List" <netatalk@fizbin.com>
To: "Basil Hussain" <basil.hussain@specialreserve.net>; "Netatalk-Admins"
<netatalk-admins@umich.edu>
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 10:53 AM
Subject: Files on Sourceforge.... (jeffb)
> on 9/21/00 1:24 AM, Basil Hussain at basil.hussain@specialreserve.net
wrote:
>
> >> The most recent netatalk package I could find was netatalk-1.5-0.
> >> 20000918mdk.i586.rpm in conjunction with
netatalk-devel-1.5-0.20000918mdk.
> >> i586.rpm from <http://test.pr.uconn.edu/i586RPMS/> -- great thanks to
> >> jeff b for providing these --
>
> Big question: didn't we discuss keeping those files (or any files, for
that
> matter) on SourceForge? As of right now, it still says:
>
> "This Project Has Not Released Any Files"
>
> Could we at least place some of the RPMs on there, or at least clearly
> visible links to those RPMs?
>
> > I'm surprised you didn't get any
> > problems with dependecies when trying to install it on SuSe.
>
> Just depends on how smart the person doing the RPM is - obviously Jeff
knows
> what he's doing...
>
> > Anyway, speaking of installing, would it be wise to chuck this RPM onto
> > RedHat Linux (seeing as that's what Mandrake is based upon), anyone?
>
> Might be good to do an i386 version of it, and then send it up to RedHat.
>
> Harry
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:32:12 EST