Subject: Re: PPD files
From: Marc Miller (itlm019@mailbox.ucdavis.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 18:08:45 EDT
PPD files should be available in a separate RPM, which can be a
"suggested" dependency (I know you can do that with .deb files; not sure
how RPMs do dependencies). We use PPR for our print queue and that
requires PPD's too. If PPD's were exclusive to netatalk pap, then
yeah; we should include those... but especially since you really only need
the PPD's for one or two printers managed by that server, why clutter the
netatalk distribution?
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, jeff b wrote:
> This is a little unrelated to anything else that has been going on ... but
> does anyone have any opinions on whether we should start including PPDs in
> the netatalk distribution?
>
> *************************
> jeff b
> system administrator
> university communications
> university of connecticut
> jeff@univrel.pr.uconn.edu
>
============================================================
/\/\arc ._|. /\/\iller (itlm019@mailbox.ucdavis.edu)
Computer Room Consultant
Information Technology/Lab Management
============================================================
I can be contacted through the Communication Center link from
http://www.mother.com/~mjmiller/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:31:50 EST