Subject: Re: Re: netatalk.com
From: BWS - Offwhite (brennan@offwhite.net)
Date: Tue Aug 01 2000 - 12:33:04 EDT
The site also happens to be very linux centric, which does not matter too
much since the configuration is identical for each system, with a
slightly different setup.
There is no universal Unix icon, is there?
I use FreeBSD for just about everything but learning Netatalk, Sendmail,
Bind or another system in that environment does not stop me from easily
running those same services on another OS like Linux or Solaris.
Perhaps the site should mention the specific OS less and less with only
side notes where necessary.
Otherwise I am very happpy to see a site in the works. I am even happier
to hear work is moving forward with a new release of Netatalk down the
road.
Brennan Stehling - web developer and sys admin
projects: www.greasydaemon.com | www.onmilwaukee.com | www.sncalumni.com
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, jeff b wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2000 Hauke Fath wrote:
> > At 09:27 01.08.00 -0400, wesley.craig@umich.edu wrote:
> > >This is the URL to the mock-up netatalk site.
> > >
> > > http://rsug.itd.umich.edu/~tombeau/netatalk/
> > >
> > >The "logo" is in the upper left corner.
> >
> >
> > I like the page -- very clean design, no meaningless chrome.
>
> It is indeed a very clean site. I don't mean to degrade or pick at anyones'
> work (far from it -- I like a lot of the design), but isn't the netatalk
> logo a little BSD specific, using the BSD daemon?
>
> *************************
> jeff b
> system administrator
> university communications
> university of connecticut
> jeff@univrel.pr.uconn.edu
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:31:46 EST