Subject: Re: Routing Table in netatalk?
From: Hong F Du (feng@scisun.sci.ccny.cuny.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 18 2000 - 15:47:35 EDT
Yes, you are right. 0192:01 on eth1 and 1964:95 on eth0 are assigned to this
machine as router.
According to my atalk.conf
eth0 -phase 2 -net 6500 -addr 6500.149 -zone "sci"....
and there is no any number as 0192 and 1964 in it.
Why didn't I see any 6500 network number shows up on the /proc/net/atalk_route?
Is there any relationship between 6500 in atalk.conf and 1964 on
/proc/net/atalk_route?
feng
andrew morgan wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Hong F Du wrote:
>
> > Thank you. That is great. How do I interpret the output of
> > #cat /proc/net/atalk_route
> > Target Router Flages Dev
> > 0192:01 0000:00 5 lo
> > 4F23:00 1964:9F 3 eth0
> > 0192:00 0192:01 1 eth1
> > 1964:95 0000:00 5 lo
> > 1964:00 1964:95 1 eth0
> > 0000:00 0000:00 5 lo
> >
> > Is Target for network number? How many routers are there totally? Are there
> > two routers on eth0, which one is my? Is Flages for hop count?
>
> If I'm understanding it correctly, "Target" is the target network number,
> and the "Router" field next to it is the gateway machine to get to that
> network. I don't think Flags is the hop count, but I don't know what it
> means either.
>
> Let me break down your information by interface:
>
> 4F23:00 1964:9F 3 eth0
> 1964:00 1964:95 1 eth0
>
> 0192:00 0192:01 1 eth1
>
> 0192:01 0000:00 5 lo
> 1964:95 0000:00 5 lo
> 0000:00 0000:00 5 lo
>
> If we look at this, you have 2 routers on eth0 and 1 router on eth1.
> However, 1 of those on each interface may be this machine. Have a look in
> /proc/net/atalk_iface to see what address is assigned to this machine.
>
> Andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:31:31 EST