Subject: Routing issue with atalkd
From: Patrik Schindler (poc@pocnet.net)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 18:53:24 EDT
Hello,
since the elder days of the original 1.4b code I saw an issue which I could not explain.
Take two linux-2.2.15-glibc-2.1.2 hosts. Install and run atalkd on both machines, which both have two network interfaces. Every machine has one connection to the other. This connection is a modem link (with vtun).
I don't think, this is an issow, because I had a similar setup 2 years ago with stock 1.4b2 via pure ethernet and the same problems.
The free network interface is connected to a Mac (OS 7.6.1/w OT 1.3 and stock OS 8.1 respectively). One side has also a 2nd linux-box running.
Nbplkup shows both linux machines (afpd) very fine. But one mac can't see the other.
I looked into /proc/atalk_iface and /proc/atalk_route and saw that the routes get set okay as expected. I also nbplkup'ed a bit and aechoed remote machines: Works perfectly.
Name propagation seems to be reliable only locally:
This is the view on the remote side. You see 17.124 (Mac/8.1).
newgen TurboPS/480:LaserWriter 5.1:132
Apple Laserwriter NTR:LaserWriter 5.1:131
Apple Laserwriter NTX:LaserWriter 5.1:129
shauny:AFPServer 5.1:130
Tektronix Phaser IIIpxi:LaserWriter 5.1:128
shauny:netatalk 5.1:4
shauny:Workstation 5.1:4
Mc: Power Macintosh 17.124:251
Mc:Workstation 17.124:4
This is the local view.
newgen TurboPS/480:LaserWriter 5.1:132
Apple Laserwriter NTR:LaserWriter 5.1:131
Apple Laserwriter NTX:LaserWriter 5.1:129
shauny:AFPServer 5.1:130
Tektronix Phaser IIIpxi:LaserWriter 5.1:128
shauny:netatalk 5.1:4
shauny:Workstation 5.1:4
And this is the local view from the 2nd box.
newgen TurboPS/480:LaserWriter 5.1:132
Apple Laserwriter NTR:LaserWriter 5.1:131
Apple Laserwriter NTX:LaserWriter 5.1:129
shauny:AFPServer 5.1:130
Tektronix Phaser IIIpxi:LaserWriter 5.1:128
shauny:netatalk 5.1:4
shauny:Workstation 5.1:4
I could verify this behaviour with trawl from the local Mac: No Mc on the other side.
Has anyone verified this behaviour befor or am I the only one which has such a "big" network? :-)
:wq! PoC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 17 2001 - 14:30:50 EST