Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] File timestamps
From: Devin Reade (gdr@eddore.myrias.com)
Date: Mon Dec 07 1998 - 23:36:19 EST
a sun wrote:
> i thought about the timestamps again, and i realized that i need to
> change the hfs module as well. so, if you're using the hfs module with
> netatalk right now, let me know what version you're using.
I think I've got the hfsfs 0.95 installed, although there's no problem
with upgrading it. Although I wouldn't mind using HFS with Netatalk,
I've pretty much avoided doing it because of some of the cautions
that were in the documentation. One in particular I remember has to
do with "user tools"; I think "rm -r" was the example. I can't avoid
using such tools, especially cvs/rcs, so I've been avoiding exporting
HFS partitions.
> However, since I used the n-981109.tar.gz archive from terminator, I
> should ask: How does n-981109 relate to the asun line? Are they
> divergent versions?
>
> the STREAMS driver should be the same. besides that, n-981109 is using
> a newer papd than the one in my patchset, but it doesn't have all the
> stuff i've done with afpd.
Ok. The afpd is (in my case) the most important component, so I guess
I'll be switching over. Hopefully the previously available Apple II
related patches will not conflict too much with yours.
Devin
-- Get a shot off _fast_. This upsets him long enough to let you make your second shot perfect. - Robert Heinlein
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:33:49 EST