RE: [netatalk-admins] byte lock, etc.

Subject: RE: [netatalk-admins] byte lock, etc.
From: Marc Matteo (MMatteo@sacbee.com)
Date: Tue Aug 25 1998 - 18:22:55 EDT

• Next message: Neil McAllister: "[netatalk-admins] Cannot be moved to the Trash -- Delete Immediately?"
• Previous message: Anthony Johnston: "[netatalk-admins] Writing System Operators"
• Maybe in reply to: Anthony Johnston: "[netatalk-admins] byte lock, etc."
• Maybe reply: Marc Matteo: "RE: [netatalk-admins] byte lock, etc."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>Number 2. I am using the RPM version from
ftp.redhat.com/contrib/and_so_on
>for 5.1 redhat. There is no source RPM. Should I try to compile the
usual
>source or is the source available for the build I am running?
>(netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.0a18.2-phh4) Hmmm.

Hmmm, the only rpm/srpm in ftp.redhat.com/contrib I could find is
netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.0-5. I used it as a model for building a
netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.0a18.2 rpm package for my personal use (I didn't
want to mess with the asun2.1 prepatch stuff yet).
If the RPM is working for you then you probably won't gain much by
switching to the raw source. Of course, if/when asun releases a new
patch then you'll have to find an upgraded RPM package, but for now
using just the RPM lets you learn more about the package w/o worrying
about it's installation.

Marc

• Next message: Neil McAllister: "[netatalk-admins] Cannot be moved to the Trash -- Delete Immediately?"
• Previous message: Anthony Johnston: "[netatalk-admins] Writing System Operators"
• Maybe in reply to: Anthony Johnston: "[netatalk-admins] byte lock, etc."
• Maybe reply: Marc Matteo: "RE: [netatalk-admins] byte lock, etc."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:33:10 EST