Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk verse ASIP
From: jon@colossus.cs.wits.ac.za
Date: Mon Aug 24 1998 - 01:53:47 EDT
hi
this is exactly what i've done, and i think it's far preferable.
____________________________________________________________
John Ostrowick
Computer Science Department, University of the Witwatersrand
Web site, ftp site and listserv all available at:
http://macaroni.cs.wits.ac.za/
On Fri, 21 Aug 1998, Alexander G. Kuprion wrote:
> I hope I'm not off topic here...
>
> I've been exploring the idea of switching our file server, a G3/233mhz running
> AppleShare IP 5.03, to MKlinux running netatalk. I've successfully gotten
> MKLinux and netatalk to work on several servers, and have permanently moved
> all FTP, Web, and mail servers to linux boxes.
>
> Is this a good or bad idea? Will I get better or worse performance with
> netatalk as opposed to continuing to use Appleshare IP (which, though it
> works, doesn't offer a lot of the features a linux box would offer..) Are
> maintaining Resource forks at all a problem with netatalk? Any and all
> comments would be greatly appreciated..
>
> BTW: If this is off topic please reply via email..
>
> Thanks for any future help..
>
>
> --
>
> Alex
>
> University of Louisville, Distance Education
> (502) 852-0570 Fax: (502) 852-3976
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:33:09 EST