Subject: Re: FW: [netatalk-admins] Large print jobs with papd...
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed Aug 05 1998 - 09:01:21 EDT
> From: "Les Klein" <[email protected]>
> To: netatalk <[email protected]>
> I have tried to persuade them to use lower resolutions but they are not
> happy about this. Anyway at 600 dpi an 8x10 still requires 200+MB of data
> which just gets through using papd. Anything bigger than 8x10 and I hit the
> 256MB limit again.
The latest theory (from [email protected]) is that this is a
binary postscript problem. The 256M limit on your machine is your
virtual memory. He has eliminated the problem with a heuristic that
causes partial lines to be written, in the event of lines over some
maximum with good results. I think a general solution would include
implementing binary transmission in papd.
:wes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:33:02 EST