[netatalk-admins] 3rd-party UAMs

Subject: [netatalk-admins] 3rd-party UAMs
From: Michael M Han (han@windy.ckm.ucsf.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 05 1998 - 03:18:30 EDT

• Next message: wesley.craig@umich.edu: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Re: problems with zones >255 under NetBSD 1.3.1"
• Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Re: problems with zones >255 under NetBSD 1.3.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

So I recall reading a message from a little while back asserting that
Apple had decided to discontinue support for 3rd-party UAMs, which
really irked me. Or I should say, support for 3rd-party UAMs for IP
AFP connections.

However, I picked up ASIP6 beta seed today and it bundles ASClient
3.8beta and the release notes imply that 3rd-party UAMs will be
supported for connections, regardless of transport protocol.

Does anyone have better information about what's going on? 3rd-party
UAM support is pretty important, I think, *especially* for IP
connections where your connection may be worldwide.
_____
Michael Han (han@library.ucsf.edu) voice: (415) 502-7542
Interactive Learning Center Consultant (415) 476-4309
San Francisco, California 94143-0840 fax: (415) 476-4653
"Closed Mondays." The Walker Art Center

• Next message: wesley.craig@umich.edu: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Re: problems with zones >255 under NetBSD 1.3.1"
• Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Re: problems with zones >255 under NetBSD 1.3.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:32:48 EST