Subject: [netatalk-admins] Re: Which architecture for x86?
From: Jarrod Stenberg (jarrod@visi.com)
Date: Wed May 27 1998 - 09:56:34 EDT
Hello,
I am about to build another Unix system with a Compaq Prosignia 300 and
have decided on other Red Hat or FreeBSD. This system will be put to
work as an application server for several macs in a lab and some windows
machines. Which flavor will permit me to get the most out of Netatalk?
I don't mean to start a debate about which is the best overall. I
simply want to know which will run Netatalk best where I can get the
most out of it. AFPFS (is that what it's called?) is very appealing to
me and I understand that it is available only for Linux. BUT FreeBSD is
what one of my heavily cgi-based sites runs on and I would like to use
the Perl compiler will be handy (the cgi site does not have it and I am
not a SysAdmin there). So FreeBSD is appealing for an unrelated reason
but that reason weighs in.
Please give me any advice you may have.
Regards,
-jarrod
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:32:45 EST