Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] current netatalk plans
From: Andras Kadinger (bandit@freeside.elte.hu)
Date: Fri Mar 20 1998 - 21:07:49 EST
[Sorry for the private copy Bob, I just didn't check the To: line the
first time.]
bsmith@h-e.com wrote:
> Do you think this will work if afpd volumes are set up so they never cross Unix
> filesystems? That would guarantee the directory inode numbers are unique within
> a volume. I don't have a problem with restricting volumes this way, I already
> have dedicated filesystems for the afpd volumes. Obviously this would be a
> site-specific "hack" and not a general solution, but it seems like it should
> work for me.
Might there be some way to put a major:minor or other filesystem
identifier combined with the inode number in that field? This should be
reasonably stable on a given machine even between afpd sessions.
Sincerely,
Andras Kadinger
bandit@freeside.elte.hu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:31:54 EST