Re: [netatalk-admins] remind me...


Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] remind me...
From: Mark Donnelly (mark@coe.missouri.edu)
Date: Mon Mar 16 1998 - 17:09:46 EST


On Mon, 16 Mar 1998 12:55:38 +0000 (GMT) Gerry.Tomlinson@newcastle.ac.uk
(Gerry.Tomlinson) wrote:

>> couldn't the master afpd do the second entry - in the same way that
>> unix login makes the initial entry and init the second.
>
>and he replied:
>
>>Well, yes and know. afpd's architecture is kind of broken. The afpd
>>parent never gets control again, after it asks for the first session.

Umm...I might be mistaken, but wouldn't SIGCHLD (signals when a child dies)
handle this? From my Linux man 7 signal:

       SIGCHLD 20,17,18 B Child stopped or terminated

Why couldn't this work?

--Mark
   "I think so Brain, but if they called them sad meals, then
    no one would buy them."



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:31:41 EST