Subject: [netatalk-admins] umich's netatalk status (or lack)
From: Harry Zink (mail-atalk@fizbin.com)
Date: Thu Mar 12 1998 - 03:29:50 EST
>Please be careful not to offend the umich netatalk people.
The ideas is NOT to offend the umich folks, as they have undoubtedly laid
a valuable foundation for netatalk, but it is not a big secret that
support from their side rivals 'nil' at this point.
I have, in the past, sent several e-mails to their provided address, and
have never received a single response, and their page, and project has
not significantly changed in a very long time.
If they have reduced their workload, or priority on this porject, I would
at least expect a note in accordance on the web-site.
Thus, yes, I too would be interested in status on umich's part, but
lacking any reasonbale response from them, I'd suggest showing no
concerning in taking the reigns of the project, and developing it
further, or spinning off a new distribution entirely.
Harry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:31:29 EST