Re: [netatalk-admins] Adding a sun's patches to Redhat 5.0


Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Adding a sun's patches to Redhat 5.0
From: a sun (asun@zoology.washington.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 27 1998 - 21:37:13 EST


   On my RH 5.0 at any rate, the PAM libs are in /lib and the includes are in
   /usr/include/security, so this strategywon't work. You can either create the
   appr links in /usr/lib and /usr/include or edit the makefile. I chose the

umm, it looks like you're describing another RH 5.0 boo-boo. you
should have a /usr/lib/libpam.so link which points to /lib/libpam.so.x
for the linker to pickup even if the actual library is in /lib. the
PAMDIR strategy actually works quite well with /usr/include/security
and /lib/libpam.so.x if the above is true. contrary to popular belief,
that's how my system is set up.

actually, i'm amazed at how many mistakes RH 5.0 seems to have
w.r.t. to this area. do people know if the RH folks are aware of these
issues?

-a



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:30:35 EST