Re: [netatalk-admins] not quite 'top' but

Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] not quite 'top' but
From: Dannyman (djhoward@uiuc.edu)
Date: Sun Oct 26 1997 - 12:53:21 EST

Next message: Dannyman: "[netatalk-admins] awho"
Previous message: Michael Zuelsdorff: "[netatalk-admins] kernel 2.0.31 and performance"
In reply to: Gregor Retti: "Re: [netatalk-admins] not quite 'top' but"
Next in thread: Nicolai Langfeldt: "Re: [netatalk-admins] not quite 'top' but"
Reply: Dannyman: "Re: [netatalk-admins] not quite 'top' but"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Pretty cool. Now in my bin/awho but modified slightly. (Thanks for the -w
observation - it applies to FreeBSd too.)

Notable as well - FreeBSD's wc doesn't support --lines. At least,
2.2.2-RELEASE (I'll be upgrading to 2.2.5-STABLE soon! :)

-- 
  //Dan   -=-     This message brought to you by djhoward@uiuc.edu    -=-
\\/yori   -=-    Information - http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/djhoward/   -=-
aiokomete -=- Your true value depends entirely on what you are compared with.

Next message: Dannyman: "[netatalk-admins] awho"
Previous message: Michael Zuelsdorff: "[netatalk-admins] kernel 2.0.31 and performance"
In reply to: Gregor Retti: "Re: [netatalk-admins] not quite 'top' but"
Next in thread: Nicolai Langfeldt: "Re: [netatalk-admins] not quite 'top' but"
Reply: Dannyman: "Re: [netatalk-admins] not quite 'top' but"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:27:45 EST