Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] does netatalk handle filelocking? (and vs. Windows NT)
From: Alistair Riddell (alistair@watsons.edin.sch.uk)
Date: Fri Oct 03 1997 - 05:30:24 EDT
Q1: AFAIK file locking has yet to be added to Netatalk.
Q2: Linux/Netatalk is free, and is also way faster than NT on the
same hardware.
Also, I think you would be hard pushed to find an NT box with an uptime of
more than a couple of months, let alone the 400 days + that I have heard
of with linux...
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Jeff Wiegley wrote:
> I'm trying to pitch to my employers that linnux/netatalk is the
> way to go for solving our windows/mac filesharing problems.
>
> I've gotten netatalk up and running without too much trouble and
> I've got a meeting set to discuss using linux as the server
> operating system versus using Windows NT.
>
> Two questions I have:
>
> 1) Does netatalk support any sort of file locking mechanisms?
> using the mac server that we now use locking seems to happen
> but under my installation of netatalk on a temporary machine
> file locking doesn't seem to happen.
>
> 2) Can everyone give me some good reasons why we should use
> linux as the operating system of choice instead of
> Windows NT? I have one supervisor who is not real keen on
> using linux because NT is a well-known commercial product.
> (I say "big deal"...)
>
> any how any answer to these questions or any other topics that
> might be of interest to note about using netatalk/samba and linux
> together would be greatly appreciated.
>
> - Jeff Wiegley
>
> --
> <html><head><title>
> J E F F W I E G L E Y
> </title></head><body><a href="http://www.w3-design.com/">
> W 3 - d e s i g n, I n c.
> <p> phone: (310) 815-1177 x 307 fax:(310) 815-1133 </p>
> </a></body></html>
>
-- Alistair Riddell - BOFH IT Support Department, George Watson's College, Edinburgh Tel: +44 131 447 7931 Ext 176 Fax: +44 131 452 8594
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:26:48 EST