Re: [netatalk-admins] netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.0a11 bug?


Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.0a11 bug?
From: Duncan Sinclair (sinclair@dis.strath.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 11 1997 - 10:04:35 EDT


cmt20@luigi.tees.ac.uk writes:
>Hi folks,
>I've just installed netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.0a11 and I seem to have discovered
>a few "undocumented features" namely:
>
> [[ Can't run two copies of "asun" netatalk. ]]

This will be because there will only be one "well-known" port, and you
can't have two servers listening to the same port.

The port is "well-known" in that the client has to know that that's where
the server is listening. So, for example, 25 is the "well-known" port
number of the SMTP mail protocol.

(sorry if this is too noddy for you.)

AppleTalk gets round this by not having "well-known" ports, but instead
puts the port number in the NBP record.

There are two solutions:
   1) Acquire a second IP number (by way of a virtual interface) and
      persuade the two afpd to run on different interfaces.
   2) Hack afpd to allow multiple virtual servers from the one afpd.
      (Sort-of like a papd.conf file for afpd.)

The second is the correct solution.

Duncan Sinclair.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:25:35 EST