Re: Netatalk security aspects?

Subject: Re: Netatalk security aspects?
From: Georg Schwarz (schwarz@physik.tu-berlin.de)
Date: Mon Jun 30 1997 - 09:58:44 EDT

• Next message: a sun: "Re: Netatalk + asuns IP-Patches Without AppleTalk..."
• Previous message: Thies C. Arntzen: "Re: Netatalk + asuns IP-Patches Without AppleTalk..."
• In reply to: Jason Luther: "Re: Netatalk security aspects?"
• Next in thread: cyerkes: "Re: Netatalk security aspects?"
• Reply: Georg Schwarz: "Re: Netatalk security aspects?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Georg Schwarz wrote:
>
> xinetd and tcpwrappers (afaik) control connections to a host based on IP
> address. xinetd is a replacement for inetd.

will this really work for AppleTalk, which is *not* based on TCP/IP?

-- 
Georg Schwarz                             schwarz@physik.tu-berlin.de
Institut für Theoretische Physik    Tel. +49 30 314-24254, FAX -21130
Technische Universität Berlin          http://home.pages.de/~schwarz/
Sekr. PN 7-1, Hardenbergstr. 36, D-10623 Berlin            IRC: kuroi

• Next message: a sun: "Re: Netatalk + asuns IP-Patches Without AppleTalk..."
• Previous message: Thies C. Arntzen: "Re: Netatalk + asuns IP-Patches Without AppleTalk..."
• In reply to: Jason Luther: "Re: Netatalk security aspects?"
• Next in thread: cyerkes: "Re: Netatalk security aspects?"
• Reply: Georg Schwarz: "Re: Netatalk security aspects?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:25:21 EST