Subject: no user logins to afpd - guest works fine
From: lars (n6892@mail.wiesbaden.netsurf.de)
Date: Thu Jun 12 1997 - 21:41:42 EDT
Hi all!
Okay, this is probably an old but good one:
Guest login to afpd on the linux box runs ok....
BUT: User logins (registered users on the linux) do not work.
I have included the messages file from the linux below (add 2 comments after the "#"):
---------START MESSAGES-------------
Jun 9 22:48:46 HOME1 syslogd 1.3-0: restart.
Jun 9 22:48:49 HOME1 kernel: klogd 1.3-0, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Jun 9 22:48:50 HOME1 kernel: Loaded 3601 symbols from /System.map.
Jun 9 22:48:50 HOME1 kernel: Symbols match kernel version.
Jun 9 22:48:51 HOME1 /usr/sbin/cron[118]: (CRON) STARTUP (fork ok)
Jun 9 22:48:54 HOME1 sendmail[130]: starting daemon (8.8.5): SMTP+queueing@00:30:00
Jun 9 22:49:00 HOME1 login[137]: ROOT LOGIN on `tty1'
Jun 9 22:49:51 HOME1 atalkd[169]: restart (1.4b2) #manually started server
Jun 9 22:49:52 HOME1 atalkd[169]: zip_getnetinfo for eth0
Jun 9 22:50:11 HOME1 last message repeated 2 times
Jun 9 22:50:21 HOME1 atalkd[169]: config for no router
Jun 9 22:50:22 HOME1 atalkd[169]: ready 0/0/0
Jun 9 22:50:35 HOME1 papd[179]: restart (1.4b2)
Jun 9 22:50:41 HOME1 afpd[181]: HOME1:AFPServer@* started on 66.230:128 (1.4b2)
Jun 9 22:53:25 HOME1 afpd[195]: session from 65503.1:236 on 66.230:129
Jun 9 22:53:25 HOME1 afpd[195]: done
Jun 9 22:53:25 HOME1 afpd[181]: asp_chld 195 done
Jun 9 22:53:29 HOME1 afpd[196]: session from 65503.1:236 on 66.230:129
Jun 9 22:53:29 HOME1 afpd[196]: login noauth
Jun 9 22:53:29 HOME1 afpd[196]: afp_getsrvrparms: stat /~: No such file or directory #problem
here?
Jun 9 22:53:54 HOME1 afpd[196]: done Jun 9 22:53:54 HOME1 afpd[181]: asp_chld 196 done
---------STOP MESSAGES-------------
Does anyone have an idea? The linux box is also running SAMBA - with no probs at all.
Is my error in the marked line? I have allready tried "Users can't log into afpd, but guest works fine. "
on http://www.umich.edu/~rsug/netatalk/trouble.html - does not seem to work.
Would "shadowed passwords" be another posibility?
With no idea at all - anymore,
seeking help,
Lars
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:24:55 EST