Subject: Re: Solaris 2.4
From: Lars Kellogg-Stedman (lars@bu.edu)
Date: Mon Dec 23 1996 - 10:01:20 EST
On Sun, 22 Dec 1996 16:15:25 -0800 john@oaty.com (John Grant) wrote:
>I suppose better still has anyone got something nice to say about it ?
I used netatalk 1.3.3 under SunOS 4.1.1 with ne'er a problem. It
compiled easily, ran well, and did pretty much what I expected it to do.
I can't comment on it's modern AFP support -- I was only using it as a
server for one or two other Macintoshes.
That said...
I have had horrid, evil problems with 1.4b2 under Solaris 2.5. I've
mentioned them here, on c.p.appletalk, and to the author; from the
errors being generated in the log files, it looks as if the code is
chopping off parts of filenames -- the net result being that netatalk
can't find any of the files in a directory, so any mounted volumes
appear empty on the Mac side.
Bummer.
I'm running an AFS system, however, and I have yet to try compiling
netatalk without the AFS support to see if this was the problem.
-- Lars
--- Lars Kellogg-Stedman * lars@bu.edu * (617)353-8277 Office of Information Technology, Boston University
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:24:17 EST