Subject: Re: memory vs cpu
From: Rich Sudlow (rich@samson.cc.nd.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 29 1996 - 09:36:30 EST
While I haven't tested this on linux. I have tested this with SunOS on
a SPARC20/71. We ran out of memory well before running out of CPU power.
Having the extra memory greatly helps increase the speed of reads when
using netatalk.
Rich
>From netatalk-admins-request@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu Thu Mar 28 20:46 EST 1996
>Resent-Message-Id: <199603282301.SAA11331@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
>Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 16:37:27 -0600 (CST)
>From: Jason Taylor <jason@strutter.cc.vanderbilt.edu>
>Subject: memory vs cpu
>To: netatalk <netatalk-admins@umich.edu>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>Resent-To: netatalk-admins@umich.edu
>Resent-From: wesley.craig@umich.edu
>Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 18:01:56 -0500
>Resent-Sender: wes@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu
>
>
>Which is netatalk more dependent on. I'm looking at setting up a machine
>to serve up to 100 machines connected at once under linux.
>
>----
>- Jason Taylor
>- jason@cornelius.cc.vanderbilt.edu
>- taylorjm@vuse.vanderbilt.edu
>- http://www.at.vanderbilt.edu/users/jason
>---
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:24:01 EST