Subject: Re: Poor performance behind an EtherWave?
From: Bill Kearney (wkearney@access.digex.net)
Date: Wed Jul 05 1995 - 14:33:29 EDT
>We are trying netatalk (1.3.3b2) on a Linux Host which is running Kernel
>version 1.2.11 and so far we are obtaining very low transfer rates! The
>Linux Host sits "behind" the MAC which itself is connected to our LAN via
>an "EtherWave". Judging by the LEDs on the Etherwave, the NET is only
>"busy" about 5% of the time. Should there be any problems running
>netatalk "behind" an Etherwave?
I'm using a few Etherwaves and have not had this kind of trouble. I'm
using a Sun 3/60 and several Macintoshes. The link to the Sun is through
an Etherwave and it's working the same as not using the Etherwave.
Sun----Mac w/etherwave-----10baseT Hub---(rest of the net)
Bill
-- Bill Kearney | wkearney@access.digex.net | PO Box 201 | kearney@newton.apple.com | Copyright 1995 Butler, MD | ftp://ftp.digex.net/pub/access/wkearney/ | W.G.Kearney (410) 239-0060 | http://www.access.digex.net/~wkearney/ |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:23:08 EST