Subject: Re: is anyone running netatalk with *transarc*'s afs?
From: hacker@citi.umich.edu
Date: Fri Oct 16 1992 - 10:18:23 EDT
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 92 14:36:29 -0700
> From: henry@ads.com (Henry Mensch)
> Subject: is anyone running netatalk with *transarc*'s afs?
>
> everything i experience in the afpd source seems to presume MIT's
> kerberos (which we don't have; we have Transarc's kerberos built into
> AFS 3.1).
Do you have AFS Kerberos for the Mac from here?? I can get it to you if you
need it .... WRT AFS:
The only parts of afpd that need AFS are
(1) an internal routine that determines free space on the volume
(2) afp_getdiracl and afp_setdiracl, which manipulate the AFS
access control lists.
(3) krb_login and krb_logincont which is the part that uses Kerberos
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:09:04 EST