Engineering 477 - Class Project
Acrophobia

Faculty Advisor - Milton Huang
Group Members:
Greg Hecht
Philip Kim
Sam Rauch
Xiaolong Zhang


We propose to work with Dr. Milton Huang on extending the Acrophobia project originally developed as an Engineering 477 class project in the fall of 1996.  We would like to bring the old model up to date as well as to extend it in a number of ways that we will described in this document.

Background - Original Motivation for Acrophobia Project

The following section was taken unmodified from last year's project homepage (http://www-personal.umich.edu/~schiller/vrreport.html).  It provides the reasoning behind this project.
 
WHY SIMULATE SUCH AN ENVIRONMENT IN VR?
 
 

The UM Hospital Department of Psychiatry (DoP) would like to investigate the feasibility of using virtual reality models to treat acrophobes. Eventually, they plan to conduct a study which compares patients' physiological (e.g., heart rate) and psychological (e.g., assessment of fear) reactions to the real and virtual environments. 

The results of such a study would contribute to the knowledge of acrophobia in general. In addition, if the virtual environment could be used in graduated exposure treatments, the following benefits could be realized: 

  • Time/Convenience. The virtual reality equipment could be stored on site at the Department of Psychiatry, eliminating need to travel to the East Elevator location. Normal elevator passengers would not be disturbed by acrophobes undergoing graduated exposure treatment.
  • Confidentiality. Because patients could receive therapy while in the office, they would not have to sacrifice confidentiality as when using the public East Elevator.
  • Control of the Environment. The doctor can easily control the virtual environment; however, the actual environment is subject to unexpected situations (e.g., imagine an elevator malfunction!). This control of the environment can also be helpful in investigating which perceptual cues are most influential to the fear. Cues could be added/subtracted from the environment methodologically while acrophobes physiological responses are monitored.
  • Less intimidating. Patients may be more willing to try the virtual environment because they know they are safely planted on the ground. 
 

Why update and extend the Acrophobia Project?

Hardware and Software Requirements

Updated