Summary of reform: General education reform varies from
institution to institution. According to Gaff (1988), central to general
education reform are the concepts content, coherence, and
comprehensiveness. The idea of content relates to what students should
know and be able to do after graduation. The idea of coherence has
emerged, to a large degree, in response to the fragmentation of the
general curriculum. A coherent general curriculum seeks to restore higher
levels of intentionally, clarity, and rationale to the curriculum.
Related to the issue of coherence is integration of knowledge. As a
result, interdisciplinary arrangements are important to general education
reform. The third idea, comprehensiveness, involves the rethinking of
the general curriculum. Such reflection considers content, appropriate
pedagogues, and what sorts of institutional support are needed.
Gaff (1992, Washington Center) has posited some important trends in
general education and they are as follows. (1) Recognition that Liberal
Arts and Sciences are fundamental to undergraduate education. (2)
Fundamental skills need greater emphasis. (3) There is a movement towards
higher standards. (4) There is also a recognition for the need for
tighter, more deliberate curricular structures. (5) There is an strong
emphasis on the freshmen year. (6) There is also increased emphasis on the
senior year. (7) More attention is being placed on global studies. (8)
Emphasis is being placed in integration and interdisciplinary approaches.
(9) Moral reflection is receiving more attention, particularly thorough
the use of non western culture and literature. (10) Active approaches to
learning have gained importance. (11) General education is being
reconceptualized to include all four years of undergraduate education.
(12) There is more and more emphasis being placed on assessment to
determine what is working. Astin (1992, Washington Center) put forth a
number of factors that enhance general education outcomes. These outcomes
were derived from his study entitled, "What really matter in general
education: provocative findings from a national study of student
outcomes." These factors are as follows (1) student-student interaction,
(2) student-faculty interaction, (3) student oriented faculty, (4)
discussion of racial/ethnic issues with other students, (5) hours devoted
to studying, (6) tutoring other students, (7) socializing with students of
different race/ethnicity, (8) a student body with high socioeconomic
status, (9) and institutional emphasis on diversity, (10) a faculty which
is positive about the general education program, and (11)
a student body that values altruism and social activism.
From presentations given at the 1991 AGLS meeting, it became clear that
general education reform needs to be particular to the institution
conducting the reform and that assessment is needed to guide such reform
(Chertok, Washington Center, 1992). In addition, these presentations also
indicated that faculty development is inexorably linked to reform efforts.
(Chertok, Washington center, 1992). Finally, Milne (Washington Center,
1992) was careful to point out that good practice, in terms of teaching
and stimulation critical thinking, is more effective than the actual
discussions of general education reform
Connection to other reforms: The breadth of this reform and its
varied outcomes suggest connections to many other reforms. Is a very wide
category. For the most part, general education refers to the "core"
curriculum of a university or college. It is related closely to critical
thinking, cultural literacy, less specialization and greater coherence,
higher standards, and interdisciplinary study.
Model Institutions: Grinnell College: clear expectations and a
strong advising system coupled with an "open" curriculum. Harvard
University: revised core curriculum in which students selecting a course
in eight of ten categories of core courses. Kalamazoo College: the
Kalamazoo Plan or K Plan. Mars Hills College, Pacific Lutheran University,
Sonoma State University, Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville
(Feldman, 1988).
Web Site:
Types of institutions: Multiple institution types
Duration: Since late 1970s.
Source list of institutions: AAC
Contact for further information: