Chapter 10 Example

Catalyst Decay in a Packed Bed

The reaction

                                                     

is carried out with excess H2 in a long packed-bed reactor containing a Ni–Mo–Cu catalyst. The reaction is first order in CO. The rate of catalyst decay is first order in CO and first order in the catalytic activity. The exiting carbon monoxide concentration was monitored as a function of time in two separate experiments, one at a high volumetric flow rate and one at a low volumetric flow rate.

For a space time of 1.0 h:

t (h)

1

4

8

12

16

20

24

CO (mol/dm3) ´ 102

0.05

0.11

0.30

0.58

0.82

0.93

0.98

For a space time of 100 h:

t (h)

10

500

1000

1050

1090

1095

1100

1110

1120

1200

CO (mol/dm3) ´ 102

0

0

0

0

0.047

0.18

0.5

0.95

0.99

1.0

Expectations

            Initially the reactor is filled with inert gas and at time t = 0 the reactant gas mixture is fed to the reactor. At the start, the reactant gas sees only fresh catalyst and methane is produced. As time goes on the catalyst at front of the reactor becomes spent as a result of being poisoned by CO and the entering reactant gas must travel further down the reactor to reach fresh catalyst.

                          

As time continues, the activity front moves on down the reactor and eventually breaks through the end of the reactor at time called the break through time tb. The figure below shows the activity profile down the reactor as a function of time. The activity profile shown is relatively steep, but the steepness will be a function of the reaction rate and the flow rate.

                                     

                                                   Activity Profile as a function of time.

If one were to look at the exit, (z = L) the conversion of CO, it might look something like

either

                               or  

                                                   (a)                                                  (b)

(a) or (b) depending on the rate of reaction and the Damköhler number. We note that same phenomena occurs in similar systems such as the leaching of uranium, the acidization of petroleum wells, and in chromatographic reactors.

Analysis

            Packed bed reactor with catalyst decay

                            

                                             

Assumptions

(1)     Neglect volume change because of XS H2 (yA0 << 1  \  e @ 0)

(2)     Neglect pressure drop

(3)     Neglect axial dispersion

(4)     Neglect CO, consumed to Poison sites

A.  The Algorithm

                                       

                                                          

Mole Balance                      

Rate Law        

Decay Law                                

Stoichiometry                      Gas phase

                                                    

Combine                                                                         (1)

                                                                                                             (2)

Initially, there is an inert gas in the reactor and at time t = 0 we will begin feeding the fresh reactant gas.

IC t = 0 CA = 0 z > 0    
BC z > Ut    a = ao (ao = 1)
(3)
  z = 0 t > 0 CA = CA0    

 

B.  Putting the Equations in Dimensionless Form

            Let

                                                     

                                                             

                                                     

                                                      

                         Da = Damköhler number which gives the shape of decay front =

                

                                           

                                                          

 = Activity Number which is related to the velocity of decay the front = 

                                                                                                  (4)

                                                                                                                 (5)

IC θ = 0 ε > 0 ψ = 0
BC ε ≥ 0   η = 1
  θ ≥ 0 ε = 0 ψ = 1

Combining Equation (1) and (2)

                                                                                                       (6)

C.  Applying the Method Of Characteristics

Recall

                                             

with

                                                                 

Let’s see what functional forms the transformation suggests for the above equation describing reaction and decay in a packed bed.

Integrating

                                                                      

the characteristic is

           

           

            Since K is an arbitrary constant we

           

            (Note: at ε = 0 and θ = 0, ∴ y = 0 and ψ = 1)                                                              (7)

D.  Using the characteristic y to obtain the exact differential Function dF = ηdε+ ψdy

                                                                   

Then

                                                   

                                                                     

                                                                                                        (8)

From Eqns (6) and (8)

                                                                                                                 (9)

Combine Eqns (5) and (9)

                                                                                                              (10)

                                                                    

Then

                                                             

                                                                                         (11)

Combining Eqns (11) and (9)

                                                        

            Exact Differential                                                                              (12)

The above equation is an exact differential. Therefore a function F exists such that

                                                               

                                                                                                                           (13)

                                                                                                                              (14)

                                                                                                                         (15)

                                                                                                               (10)

Substituting Eqns (13), (14) and (15) into Eqn (10)

                                                                                                           (16)

E.  Solving the Hyperbolic PDE

            This is a Hyperbolic PDE and there are known transforms to solve hyperbolic PDEs

            Let                                                                                       (17)

                                               

                                            

Then                                                                                                                       (18)

The most general solution is

                                                                                                              (19)

Recalling Eqn (14)

                                                              (20)

at ε = 0   ψ = 1, Eqn. (20) becomes

                                                             

                                                                                                          (21)

Recalling Eqn (13)

                                                                                                 (22)

at y = 0   η = 1, Eqn (21) becomes

                                                        

                                                                                                                      (23)

                                                                                                              (19)

Substituting Eqns (21) and (23) into Eqn. (19)

                                                                                                           (24)

                                           

                                             

                                                                                              (25)

F.  Putting everything back in terms of Da and Ac

                                         (26)

                                                                                    (27)

                                                             (28)

G.  Evaluating the Parameters form Experimental Data

            At exit,

                                       

                                                                (29)

Figure 1. Dimensionless exit concentration function versus q

We have used data the concentration ratio, (ψe = CAe/CA0) at the exit, z=L, to evaluate the product DaAc. We will now evaluate the activity number, Ac, from the movement of the reaction front and the time it takes to break through at the end of the reactor, z=L.

H.  Movement of the Reaction Front

            Look at the exponential terms in Eqn (26) that are multiplied by DaAc. The arguments are zero when θ = ε and when. These relationships give the movement of two fronts. This front gives the dimensionless position of fresh gas interface

                                                           

This front gives the dimensionless position of the decay activity interface

                                                                 

Now that we have the product DaAc from the slope of Figure 1. At breakthrough of the activity front at the end of the reactor ε = 1

                                                               

                                                                   

The breakthrough time is used to calculate the activity number

                                                            

I.  Position of Reaction (Decay) Front

                                                                

                                          

                                          

                                                                        High Da

                                          

                                                                        Low Da

Figure 2. Profile of y and h

Figure 3. Comparison of Theory and Experiment

From Lund and Fogler Chem. Engrg. Sci. 31 p381 (1976).

Back to Chapter 10